This question considers whether maintaining and repairing current infrastructure should take precedence over constructing new roads and bridges. Proponents argue that it ensures safety, extends the life of existing infrastructure, and is more cost-effective. Opponents argue that new infrastructure is needed to support growth and improve transportation networks.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
Province/Territory
Response rates from 2.1k Canada voters.
78% Yes |
22% No |
78% Yes |
22% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.1k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.1k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B53N9FM1mo1MO
they should maintained both until the government can replace the existing roads with newer infrastructure as a whole.
@B4TKMPG2mos2MO
As long as doing so would not drain our economy due to the rate at which old infrastructures breakdown after being fixed and thus, the need to fix them again
@B4R3Z5C2mos2MO
Both things are important. New infrastructure should be prioritized except in cases where existing infrastructure has become dangerous when not maintained or repaired.
@B2W86PR4mos4MO
The needs of individual communities need to be considered.
@B2Q85HW4mos4MO
I dont think they should building road and bridge rather than building, I think they should do both buildings and roads.
@B2PWNX64mos4MO
Yes, but only in regards to vital roads and traffic chokepoints
@B2PLZ3Y4mos4MO
road infrastructure, yes. Transit infrastructure, no.
@B2LZJBR4mos4MO
Both should be equally prioritized, Canada lacks proper and easy transportation especially cross province transports.
Join in on the most popular conversations.